Connected, synced sources
We connect Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence or your help center. Each passage is stored with its title, date and link, and the sync picks up documents that change or get deleted.
Your team asks in plain language and the assistant answers with what your documents actually say, linking the exact source. When the answer isn't there, it's set up to say so.
An AI knowledge base built on RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) finds the relevant passages in your company documents and writes the answer from them, citing the source. We deploy it for teams that lose time hunting for internal information or repeating the same answers. You start with a 7-day trial on a single source, using your team's real questions.
We connect Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence or your help center. Each passage is stored with its title, date and link, and the sync picks up documents that change or get deleted.
Each passage carries team or access-level metadata, and search filters by who is asking. Anything that shouldn't be searchable stays out of the index, and we agree with you on how to reflect very granular permissions.
Every answer links the document and section it comes from, so anyone can check it, and the assistant is instructed to say it can't find something rather than improvise. RAG reduces made-up answers but doesn't eliminate them.
Your team checks procedures, spec sheets, policies or support history every day, and that documentation exists and is reasonably current.
An unevaluated assistant is just a demo, so we test it against real questions before the team uses it.
Your team writes questions with the expected answer and its source. We review by hand and with a second model as a judge, and rerun the set after every change to the model, chunking or instructions. Once live, user votes and unanswered questions reveal documentation gaps.
We choose one source with you, such as one department's procedures folder, and one channel. We build the assistant with citations, run your team's questions and review the results together before adding sources. Scope, dates and terms are agreed in writing before we start.
With RAG, the model isn't retrained on your documents; it only receives the passages needed for each answer. We choose providers whose API terms exclude that data from training and, if data can't leave your infrastructure, we look at open models on your own server. The legal assessment is up to your advisor.
Yes, with caveats. We filter by groups or collections based on who is asking, as long as the channel, such as Slack or Teams, identifies the person. Mirroring very granular folder permissions exactly is more complex, so we agree on a clear access model before indexing.
Scanned PDFs need OCR, and complex tables lose their structure if they're split badly, so we handle them separately. Spreadsheets full of figures are better queried through a direct integration, because the assistant shouldn't calculate from fragments. During the assessment we flag the documents that will cause trouble.
Your team owns the content: when a procedure changes, the assistant reflects it after the next sync. We leave ingestion automated, alerts if a sync fails and a guide for adding sources. If you'd like us to keep reviewing evaluations and tuning, that's agreed separately.
Send us an example and tell us where the answer lives today. We'll propose a 7-day trial on that source, with results to review before you decide.
Pick a goal and we'll suggest the services that fit best.